It seems to be used that have certain verbs or even in a beneficial certain sense of the brand new verb

/bi-/ has been stated having locative-terminative push as opposed to strictly locative force getting /ba-/, however, Thomsen claims towards p. 184, this “is most probably perhaps not instantly used in the reason of concord which have good loc.-label. or loc. noun, it alternatively serves the new semantic differentiation of the verb. “

>ba(I): has a good separative form. For the OBGT it directly correlates having >Akkadian t-stems. (Thomsen, pursuing the Jacobsen, confuses t-stems >towards Akkadian best.) Their position try once the fresh new ventive >marker yards and therefore the b was absorbed: m-ba- > m-ma, and when this is exactly >accompanied by a 2nd individual pronoun, it will become m-ma > m-mu (very ba >isn’t necessarily straightforward to recognize). Regarding lack of the new >ventive marker it uses up the first position about chain, following they >try not to always be renowned out of ba(II). A clear case was >ba-ne-su8-be2-durante-de3-dentro de = ni-it-tal2-lak cu-nu-ci = i go away >to them (OBGT VII, 305). > >ba(II): provides an effective stative/passive mode. Inside the OBGT VI, it’s rendered because of the >a c-base stative/couch potato, or an enthusiastic Nt-stem inactive. Apparently, ba(II) >occupies the first position from the chain. ba-ab-gar, ba-ab-gar-re-durante >= cuckun, cuckunaku = he has got been placed / I’ve been place >(by the individuals unnamed). The brand new models ba-gar, ba-gar-re-en, . ba-na-gar, >ba-na-gar-re-durante inside the OBGT VI, contours 160-165, is actually unknown; they may be able >as an alternative feel interpreted because ba(I), particularly the next series, >which is one or two-fellow member, additionally the OB grammarian, whom rendered http://www.datingranking.net/cs/buddygays-recenze him or her >by the Nt-base passives, aswell preserved brand new ambiguity. > >The statement demonstrably pertains to ba(II), but I really don’t think it is just a beneficial >question of liking, immediately after one has set ba(I) aside. Without a doubt, it’s >method beyond my personal resources and you can my ability to test my a lot more than >syntactical/lexical says from unilingual texts. > >Using my best regards, >Peter J. Huber

I thought of all of the intransitive sentences one prevent which have ba-Options, such as for example ba-gul, “it absolutely was shed”. Because you say, the individuals belong the category of ba(II).

I’d provides envision it actually was good >Hebrew term, but then once again, I don’t know the relationship of your own Sumerian >vocabulary and the Hebrew code

Thanks for finding the time to try to describe this procedure. I’m able to just be sure to summary just what Hayes has on users 162 and you will 256: The guy agrees that scholars provides speculated there can be one or two ba- conjugation prefixes which can be homonyms. “One is seen mainly in couch potato phrases, additional in faster definable contexts.” As well as, new conjugation prefix bi2- often occurs that have nominal phrases regarding locative-terminative situation and the conjugation prefix ba- possibly takes place that have moderate sentences from the locative case. “It is this trend away from co-thickness with contributed numerous students in conclusion one to bi2- and you can ba- are not of the identical review since the most other conjugation prefixes, and are probably including multiple function.” So that form of ba- are priced between a component you to means the fresh new locative case. To have good separative meaning, you would expect discover Sumerian moderate sentences end towards ablative postposition -ta.

Mention the delicate differences >manufactured in OBGT VI, traces 79-84, between your normal G-stem stative >in addition to C-base stative/passive: an-gar, an-gar-re-en = cakin, >caknaku = he’s place, I am set, versus

>I was wondering for those who you will respond to a question personally. I’ve read someplace >that term “Eden” are a good Sumerian keyword. > >At the very least, if the Eden, Adam, and/or Eve are Sumerian words, might you >delight let me know whether they have an interpretation/definition?

EDIN is actually an effective Sumerian phrase, nevertheless refers to the steppe property among them rivers, where the herd dogs grazed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.